Packet D: Bonus 18
Roy Pascal’s book The Dual Voice explores this narrative technique and is subtitled for it. For 10 points each:
[10m] Name this three-word technique that conflates the third-person narrator and first-person character’s titular dual voices to convey the mental life and speech of characters.
ANSWER: free indirect discourse [or FID; or free indirect speech; or free indirect style; accept discours indirect libre; accept erlebte Rede]
[10e] Pascal argues this literary device invites psychological interpretations, unlike FID. This device in which a character speaks their thoughts is common in theater, such as Macbeth’s “Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow.”
ANSWER: soliloquy [prompt on monologue]
[10h] The preface to this novel discusses the benefits and dangers of the first-person narrator and introduces the concept of ficelles. This novel’s American protagonist is aided by the ficelle character Maria Gostrey.
ANSWER: The Ambassadors (by Henry James)
<JK, British Literature> | Packet D - UBC B, Oxford A, Waterloo B, CWRU A
| Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | 14.24 | 91% | 36% | 15% |
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama B | Tennessee A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Berkeley A | Berkeley B | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
| Berkeley C | Berkeley D | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Cambridge A | Southampton B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Cardiff | Edinburgh A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Chicago C | Illinois A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Georgia Tech B | Georgia Tech D | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| John Jay | Columbia B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Liberty A | Virginia Tech B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| MIT | Bowdoin A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Manchester | Warwick B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Maryland A | NYU C | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EH |
| Michigan B | Ohio State A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Michigan C | Ohio State B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Minnesota A | Washington A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
| Missouri A | Claremont | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| NYU A | NYU B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Notre Dame A | Chicago D | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Purdue A | Indiana A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Purdue B | Illinois C | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Rutgers A | Johns Hopkins A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Southampton A | Warwick A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Southern Connecticut State | Brown | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | M |
| Stanford B | Stanford A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Texas A | Texas A&M A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Texas B | Murray State A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UCLA A | UCSD B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UCLA B | UC Santa Barbara | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia | North Carolina B | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
| Virginia Tech A | South Carolina B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| WashU A | Sewanee | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
| WashU B | Louisville A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Washington B | Missouri B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California (North) | Main Site | ✓ | 3 | 16.67 | 100% | 33% | 33% |
| California (South) | Main Site | ✓ | 2 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Great Lakes | Main Site | ✓ | 2 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Lower Mid-Atlantic | Main Site | ✓ | 3 | 16.67 | 100% | 33% | 33% |
| Midwest | Main Site | ✓ | 4 | 12.50 | 100% | 25% | 0% |
| Northeast | Main Site | ✓ | 2 | 15.00 | 50% | 100% | 0% |
| Overflow | Main Site | ✓ | 3 | 16.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% |
| South Central | Main Site | ✓ | 2 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Southeast | Main Site | ✓ | 4 | 15.00 | 100% | 25% | 25% |
| UK | Main Site | ✓ | 4 | 15.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| Upper Mid-Atlantic | Main Site | ✓ | 4 | 15.00 | 75% | 50% | 25% |